SecurityScorecard has a total of 46 patents globally, out of which 36 have been granted. Of these 46 patents, more than 93% patents are active. The United States of America is where SecurityScorecard has filed the maximum number of patents, followed by Canada and Europe. Parallelly, the United States of America seems to be the main focused R&D centre and also is the origin country of SecurityScorecard.
SecurityScorecard was founded in the year 2013. Cyber-risk management services are provided by SecurityScorecard. The firm provides cloud-based IT security services, real-time third-party security, risk grading services, board reporting, and cyber insurance underwriting. Worldwide customers are served by SecurityScorecard.
Do read about some of the most popular patents of SecurityScorecard which have been covered by us in this article and also you can find SecurityScorecard patents information, the worldwide patent filing activity and its patent filing trend over the years, and many other stats over SecurityScorecard patent portfolio.
How many patents does the founder and the CEO of SecurityScorecard have?
The founder Sam Kassoumeh have 8 patents and Aleksandr Yampolskiy (Also CEO) have 29 patents.
How many patents does SecurityScorecard have?
SecurityScorecard has a total of 46 patents globally. These patents belong to 6 unique patent families. Out of 46 patents, 43 patents are active.
How Many Patents did SecurityScorecard File Every Year?
Are you wondering why there is a drop in patent filing for the last two years? It is because a patent application can take up to 18 months to get published. Certainly, it doesn’t suggest a decrease in the patent filing.
| Year of Patents Filing or Grant | SecurityScorecard Applications Filed | SecurityScorecard Patents Granted |
| 2022 | 1 | 6 |
| 2021 | 3 | 5 |
| 2020 | 5 | 5 |
| 2019 | 10 | 8 |
| 2018 | 3 | 1 |
| 2017 | 6 | 2 |
| 2016 | 8 | 6 |
| 2015 | 9 | 3 |
| 2014 | 1 | – |
How many SecurityScorecard patents are Alive/Dead?
How Many Patents did SecurityScorecard File in Different Countries?
Countries in which SecurityScorecard Filed Patents
| Country | Patents |
| United States Of America | 38 |
| Canada | 3 |
| Europe | 2 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Where are the Research Centres of SecurityScorecard Patents Located?
The Research Center of SecurityScorecard Patents is the United States of America.
10 Best SecurityScorecard Patents
US9294498B1 is the most popular patent in the SecurityScorecard portfolio. It has received 167 citations so far from companies like Microsoft, BitSight, and Amazon.
Below is the list of 10 most cited patents of SecurityScorecard:
| Publication Number | Citation Count |
| US9294498B1 | 167 |
| US10546135B1 | 166 |
| US20160171415A1 | 151 |
| US9501647B2 | 62 |
| USD740847S1 | 42 |
| USD759084S1 | 41 |
| USD819687S1 | 33 |
| USD772276S1 | 32 |
| USD771695S1 | 30 |
| USD776153S1 | 29 |
How many inventions of other companies were rejected due to SecurityScorecard patents?
The statistics below share strategic R&D insights. It tells the companies that were trying to protect inventions similar to the SecurityScorecard invention. They couldn’t because SecurityScorecard had protected those before them.
Examiners at the USPTO used 9 SecurityScorecard patents in 40 rejections (35 USC § 102 or 35 USC § 103 types).
The top citing companies in the SecurityScorecard patent portfolio are CA inc, Qomplx, and Amazon.
List of the Companies who’s Patents were rejected citing SecurityScorecard –
| Company | Number of Patent Applications that faced Rejection Citing SecurityScorecard Patents | Number of Rejections (102 & 103) |
| Ca Inc | 5 | 6 |
| Qomplx | 2 | 3 |
| Amazon | 2 | 2 |
| Fujitsu | 2 | 2 |
| Sixth Street Specialty Lending | 1 | 1 |
| Naver Business Platform | 1 | 2 |
| Micro Focus | 1 | 1 |
| Bank Of America | 1 | 1 |
| Arizona State University | 1 | 2 |
| C3Ai | 1 | 4 |
What Percentage of SecurityScorecard US Patent Applications were Granted?
SecurityScorecard (Excluding its subsidiaries) has filed 30 patent applications at USPTO so far (Excluding Design and PCT applications). Out of these 24 have been granted leading to a grant rate of 100%.
Below are the key stats of SecurityScorecard patent prosecution at the USPTO.
Which Law Firms Filed Most US Patents for SecurityScorecard?
| Law Firm | Total Applications | Success Rate |
| Norton Rose Fulbright | 30 | 100% |
List of SecurityScorecard patents
| SecurityScorecard Patents | Title |
| US11475384B2 | Non-Intrusive Techniques For Discovering And Using Organizational Relationships |
| US11451572B2 | Online Portal For Improving Cybersecurity Risk Scores |
| US11386210B2 | Inquiry Response Mapping For Determining A Cybersecurity Risk Level Of An Entity |
| US11336677B2 | Online Portal For Improving Cybersecurity Risk Scores |
| US11275843B2 | Inquiry Response Mapping For Determining A Cybersecurity Risk Level Of An Entity |
| US11140192B2 | Entity Ip Mapping |
| US11037083B2 | Non-Intrusive Techniques For Discovering And Using Organizational Relationships |
| US10990916B2 | Reducing Cybersecurity Risk Level Of A Portfolio Of Companies Using A Cybersecurity Risk Multiplier |
| US10931704B2 | Entity Ip Mapping |
| US10848517B1 | Cybersecurity Risk Assessment On An Industry Basis |
| US10671957B2 | Reducing Cybersecurity Risk Level Of A Portfolio Of Companies Using A Cybersecurity Risk Multiplier |
| US10614401B2 | Reducing Cybersecurity Risk Level Of Portfolio Of Companies Using A Cybersecurity Risk Multiplier |
| US10560474B2 | Entity Ip Mapping |
| US10546135B1 | Inquiry Response Mapping For Determining A Cybersecurity Risk Level Of An Entity |
| US10515328B2 | Non-Intrusive Techniques For Discovering And Using Organizational Relationships |
| US10498756B2 | Calculating And Benchmarking An Entity’S Cybersecurity Risk Score |
| US10491619B2 | Online Portal For Improving Cybersecurity Risk Scores |
| US10491620B2 | Entity Ip Mapping |
| US10438155B2 | Reducing Cybersecurity Risk Level Of A Portfolio Of Companies Using A Cybersecurity Risk Multiplier |
| US10268976B2 | Non-Intrusive Techniques For Discovering And Using Organizational Relationships |
| US10230753B2 | Entity Ip Mapping |
| US10217071B2 | Reducing Cybersecurity Risk Level Of A Portfolio Of Companies Using A Cybersecurity Risk Multiplier |
| USD819687S1 | Display Screen Or Portion Thereof With Graphical User Interface For Security To Reduce Risk |
| US9641547B2 | Entity Ip Mapping |
| USD776153S1 | Display Screen Or Portion Thereof With Graphical User Interface For Security To Reduce Risk |
| USD772276S1 | Display Screen Or Portion Thereof With Graphical User Interface For Security To Reduce Risk |
| US9501647B2 | Calculating And Benchmarking An Entity’S Cybersecurity Risk Score |
| USD771695S1 | Display Screen Or Portion Thereof With Graphical User Interface For Security To Reduce Risk |
| US9372994B1 | Entity Ip Mapping |
| USD759084S1 | Display Screen Or Portion Thereof With Graphical User Interface For Security To Reduce Risk |
| US9294498B1 | Online Portal For Improving Cybersecurity Risk Scores |
| USD740847S1 | Display Screen Or Portion Thereof With Graphical User Interface For Security To Reduce Risk |
| US20220179968A1 | Inquiry Response Mapping For Determining A Cybersecurity Risk Level Of An Entity |
| US20220030024A1 | Entity Ip Mapping |
| US20210264336A1 | Reducing Cybersecurity Risk Level Of A Portfolio Of Companies Using A Cybersecurity Risk Multiplier |
| US20210176270A1 | Entity Ip Mapping |
| US20210176267A1 | Cybersecurity Risk Assessment On An Industry Basis |
| US20160171415A1 | Cybersecurity Risk Assessment On An Industry Basis |
| EP3417405A4 | Non-Intrusive Techniques For Discovering And Using Organizational Relationships |
| WO2019023045A1 | Reducing Cybersecurity Risk Level Of A Portfolio Of Companies Using A Cybersecurity Risk Multiplier |
| WO2017142694A1 | Non-Intrusive Techniques For Discovering And Using Organizational Relationships |
| CA3104308C | Non-Intrusive Techniques For Discovering And Using Organizational Relationships |
| CA3015146C | Non-Intrusive Techniques For Discovering And Using Organizational Relationships |
| CA3071456A1 | Reducing Cybersecurity Risk Level Of A Portfolio Of Companies Using A Cybersecurity Risk Multiplier |
| EU0027183040001S | Interfaces For A Display Screen |
| GB90027183040001S | Interfaces For A Display Screen |